lisamarie_625 Question : How do you get the fast tax refund online with turbo tax How long does it usually take to receive the tax refund check if you file online using tax turbo? Presentation of domani.Grazie! Best answer: Answer by
chemikal201983
2-3 weeks after acceptance and processing
Add your answer in the comments!
economic team of President Obama released a bold new economic proposal. Cenk Uygur discusses the reality of our business tax system. Tell us in the comments section below if you agree with the proposal of President Obama’s corporate tax rate. Subscribe to the Young Turks: bit.ly Learn how to watch the Young Turks in Current clicking here: www.current.com show’s biggest online New World. + Google: www.gplus.to Facebook: www.facebook.com Twitter: twitter.comVideo Rating: 4/5
Posts
26 comments
Skip to comment form ↓
Tim S
July 11, 2012 at 9:45 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
Not sure about turbo tax, but the file is later, is almost as fast as possible, I never tried TT, but I know that working late veloce.In File luck.
in0d3
July 11, 2012 at 10:19 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
The dates for repayment are reported in IRS Publication 2043.Generalmente is 1-2 weeks for direct deposit, and 2-3 weeks to verify a document to be sent (add an extra week for it to be up to you.)
Shanden Martin
July 11, 2012 at 10:33 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
This is stupid. ALL corporate taxes are placed on people, everything is a tax on people and their profits. Those who think other wise is not looking at the whole picture
SharkBait782
July 11, 2012 at 11:17 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
@ Ridiculous unclepic1. Companies are looking to China and India and other countries because people can not buy their products. Globalization has also led American companies to cut costs by hiring workers to produce abroad. Our lower tax rates, in the meantime has come because of these companies have a lot of political power. From the ’50s until the ’70s, people could buy, because their wages with productivity could grow. For more than 30 years, this has not happened.
unclepic1
July 11, 2012 at 11:30 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
Well the fact that in the 50s the rate of corporation tax was capable of being so high is because there was going to China at that time. That was when companies do not exploit cheap labor and low taxes as they do now. Obama is right on this issue is clearly understood that the only thing we can do before lowering minimum wage and repealing laws that protect the worker is cutting tax revenues from these companies to create more of an incentive to come here .
thewag777
July 11, 2012 at 11:58 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
You see, it’s the small businesses that are most affected. do not know how to exploit all the loopholes that make their efficacy rate of 12%. But large companies like GE to know every trick in the book. Probably lobbied for most of them!
MillionMUFFIN
July 12, 2012 at 12:48 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
corporations fuck fuck fuck governoSto all just waiting for the government just drop the corporate tax to 0 and watch everything burn.
viewmaster4000
July 12, 2012 at 1:43 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
Obama is used to appease the masses, especially blacks. It ‘was a master move the Jews who run the banks and create all policies.
harrisonconstantinou
July 12, 2012 at 2:04 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
iam pretty progressive, but I still believe that corporate tax rates should be lower to increase investment in the economy, Canada has had a rate of 43% of firms in 2000, now its rate of 15% in 2012 and our economy is preforming better than ever
Yu5b0w
July 12, 2012 at 2:42 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
corporate tax rates are now at 39.2% and not 35%?
NOTSODOTCALM
July 12, 2012 at 3:08 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
It ‘s good that the people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, because if they did, I think there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning. – Henry Ford
Relbl
July 12, 2012 at 3:09 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
There seems to be a huge contradiction in this video. He says effective tax rate of 12%, but if you take away every loophole and make the basic rate of 28% then you add the deficit …? This will be fiscally neutral (most likely) for the mega-body and give companies more small (fewer than write off that debt service), a break. I do not see a problem with this so much, especially since these are small businesses that are hurt most by the new costs of health care plan. It seems reasonable right?
xaviqaz
July 12, 2012 at 3:54 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
The nominal rate of corporation tax has not been lowered since 1986. The Congress just passed tax loopholes that favor large firms, whereas U.S. companies of small and medium enterprises pay the highest rate in the world. In countries such as Germany, Sweden, Austria or Denmark, the nominal rate of corporation tax has been cut in half over the last 10-15 years. Scnadinavians actually enjoy the lowest corporate tax rate in Western Europe.
xaviqaz
July 12, 2012 at 4:39 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
The ECB is less socialist than the Fed
TheBulletDodgingMan
July 12, 2012 at 4:53 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
Kike.
buellfreak
July 12, 2012 at 5:46 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
Finally, some company representatives said that if they had to pay higher taxes would be forced to increase prices of goods and services. Sounds like a threat to me. Their profits are at a higher 60 years! The tax bracket should be changed to what it was 60 years ago.
DRok112
July 12, 2012 at 5:51 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
Typical socialist pro-corporate agenda, enriching private companies at the expense of … Heeeeeeeey, wait a minute! This is not socialism at all! I guess that’s settled then. Obama is a flat-out fanatical Muslim communist who hates religion. Obviously.
ActaNonVerba71
July 12, 2012 at 6:30 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
For all the people that do not support Ron Paul and want a good laugh: youtube.com / watch v = 4EQSOwgWG1c
EndTheFedRes
July 12, 2012 at 7:20 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
I understand our structure of government better than anyone else in this country, and certainly more than a stranger who stutters. REPUBLIC nvieira100 I suggest you learn the difference between the Republic and democracy … if this is what you were referring to.
WittyPsuedonym
July 12, 2012 at 7:57 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
Google Ezra Klein’s recent post “We have read so you do not need lessons on OECD tax policy” – is a good place to partenza.E ‘true that corporate taxes have fallen, but crashed in a very twisted and ineffective way, with the exemptions and deductions by large incumbents and corporate tax rates that leave high technology start-up of new industries. We need a more level playing field to help new businesses grow.
Stingerbillion
July 12, 2012 at 8:33 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
This is f-tion absurd. I do not think that the true tax reform will never happen in this country, not more. The tax of 1% should be 45% and 39.6% (which is a joke), and taxes of the middle class should be of 36.6%. Property tax should go to 50%, and corporate tax to 30% FLAT! This country is a disgrace.
nvieira100
July 12, 2012 at 9:32 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
Do not bank “s”. A privately owned central bank called the Federal Reserve and no, the Fed is not a govmt dept / branch or even owned.It govt is a private bank that owns the U.S. government. As for “this was the case for centuries”, not the United States. You should study the history of the United States in regard to the Fed in the United Kingdom and European Union, so banks have been used for centuries ctrl thx to Rothschild. Getting rid of the Fed and all banks would be a ctrl important step to clean up the financial corruption.
nvieira100
July 12, 2012 at 10:23 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
Wow! I do not know even what kind of governance structure / country you live! No wonder your country is all screwed up, if all Americans are stupid and ignorant like you.
nvieira100
July 12, 2012 at 10:25 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
Reducing taxes corp will help economic growth? Really? What proof is there of this? All you have to do is look at the last 50yrs I know it’s a complete lie. Corp taxes have been lowered consistently since the 50s and the result has been steady economic decline in parallel with the corp tax cuts. Get real and stop buying into propaganda.
WittyPsuedonym
July 12, 2012 at 10:59 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
There is indeed something to be said for reducing corporate taxes to help economic growth. But we still need to reduce inequalities with something like a tax / wealth tax on the value of land / progressive on consumption, or reducing the big regressive income tax loopholes (such as lower capital gains rate, the mortgage interest deduction, or by the employer to deduct health insurance)
genie0390
July 12, 2012 at 11:27 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
@ Michaeltickledick “Every Asian economy, without exception, reflected a massive state intervention in the economy.” Enough of your thinking delirantemotivo for which Japan and other Asian countries intervened so much was to raise huge amounts of capital needed to compete with the ‘America. It played right, could not compete, simple. Europe has done the same with an Airbus funding to be able to compete with Boeing. Stupid Americans stand by and let this happen, not free enterprise